Assume
a scenario where an assembly line builds three major variations of a
similar end-product. Assume also that the upper component comes from
three separate sources (vendors or workcenters). The graph at right
shows average demand for each product.
On large
assembly line, setup is often problematic. Parts are brought
in for a new job and remaining parts taken away for the
just-completed job. Such lines often need re-balancing with different stations and
task assignments. Then, there is the initial startup as
everyone gets accustomed to the new configuration. If parts do not
fit, or cannot be found, there is more disturbance. When, at last,
the line is humming, nobody wants to disturb it with another
changeover. |
Such is the case
with our hypothetical assembly line. And so, once setup, it runs for
at least a week on the first product, 1-GRN. At the end of a week,
40 units are complete.
After another frenetic changeover to
product 2-YEL, the line runs for 2.0 weeks since the demand for this
part is higher. Another changeover and, for another week, the line
runs 3-RED. The three frames below illustrate.
The three suppliers for the upper covers
of, respectively, 1-GRN, 2-YEL and 3-RED, see high demand for one or
two weeks and then no demand for 2-3 weeks.
One way to deal with
this intermittent upstream demand is to size upstream
production for the overall average demand for each part and then
build inventory between production runs. This, however, creates a
host of inventory control, scheduling and quality problems.
The Mixed Model
Assembly line addresses this situation.
More>>
|