|
Beginning
in the 1950's with early missile programs, the Department Of Defense
sponsored a new science called Reliability. Reliability
is the science of maintenance.
It uses statistics and failure theory to measure, understand and improve
the performance of equipment and maintenance. Reliability theory can
guide engineers as they design and test new equipment. After equipment
has been in service, reliability data tells the maintenance engineer how
to improve its performance.
As
the Gulf Wars demonstrated, this science has produced outstanding results
in defense. Regrettably, little of this knowledge has found its way into
industry. Most
maintenance operations still operate on the principal of "if it
ain't broke, don't fix it".
This breakdown theory of maintenance generates several undesirable
effects:
Breakdowns
occur at the worst moment–
when a customer is waiting, process timing is important, or when people
are standing by. This unplanned downtime is far worse than intended
downtime. Breakdowns often cause collateral damage that far exceeds the
original problem. For example, a $38.00 roller bearing on a plastics
extruder fails. The resulting misalignment of the shaft destroys the
gears and the pinion shaft, three other bearings and an oil seal. The
sudden stoppage causes plastic to freeze in the barrels. The total cost
is about $13,000 plus three days of lost production. A routine
inspection using vibration analysis or even the touch and hearing of an
experienced mechanic could have prevented almost all of this loss.
Breakdowns
are one of many reasons for excessive inventory buffers.
Such inventory allows other production to proceed while the breakdown is
fixed. But this inventory is expensive. Moreover, there are other
associated costs such as space, tracking and insurance. At
least 75% of quality problems have a maintenance component.
This causes customer dissatisfaction, scrap and further bloats
inventory.
Phantom
capacity, the
difference between theoretical capacity and actual output is often the
result of maintenance problems which generate downtime, scrap and
scheduling difficulty. Some
plants have as much as 40% phantom capacity.
The
True Cost Of Maintenance
Accounting
systems rigorously capture the direct cost of maintenance. They rarely
capture the costs of non-maintenance such as those above.
The graph shows how total cost varies with the level of maintenance. The
left side of the curve reflects a "breakdown" maintenance
strategy, i.e., maintenance effort is assigned only when equipment
fails. As the level of maintenance moves up, effort is made to regularly
service equipment.
The Five stages of
maintenance
1- No action until equipment fails
2- Routine service– oil and grease
3- Inspection and preventive repair
4- Equipment Re-Engineering
5- Predictive Maintenance

Metrics
The
key to excellence in maintenance is a good system of metrics. Some of
the key metrics are:
-
Availability
-
Mean
Time Between Failures (MTBF)
-
Mean
Time To Repair (MTTR)
-
Mission
Reliability
-
Breakdown
Effort Ratio
-
Maintenance
Cost/Output Unit
Total
Quality Management (TQM)
Quality
teams will find many issues that involve maintenance. The technical
tools such as Pareto Diagrams, Ishikawa Diagrams and control charts are
valuable diagnostics and indicators. Combined with the metrics and tools
of Reliability they help the maintenance department permanently solve
problems.
Teams
Initially,
maintenance personnel should be members of problem-solving teams. When
the company has fully re-structured, these people may become part of
Self-Directed Work Teams. Maintenance will also form internal teams to
examine their internal processes as well as specific equipment problems
where maintenance issues dominate.
Organization
Restructuring
As
the above elements come into place, the maintenance organization should
change. More maintenance tasks are taken on by the operators and users
of equipment. The centralized maintenance department takes on a new
mission which emphasizes:
-
Specialized
expertise that does not fit easily into operating units
-
Setting
minimum standards for metrics and reporting
-
Training
-
Common
Spare Parts Stocking
Information
Technology
Information
Technology has made rigorous use of maintenance metrics easy.
Many maintenance software systems exist. They can assist in almost every
area of maintenance. The track spare parts, compile time and costs,
track metrics, schedule work and analyze vibration. But a software
program does not guarantee good maintenance performance. Software cannot
compensate for a lack of fundamental knowledge. In many cases, software
has harmed maintenance efforts by diverting resources and delaying
action on the true causes of non-performance.
What
Can You Achieve?
Competitiveness
and Profitability are the goals of our work. Maintenance can and should
be a prime contributor. We can help you select the appropriate elements
from TQM, BPR and other innovative programs and successfully implement
them in your operations. A
well executed drive towards maintenance excellence can—–
-
Achieve
Availabilities Of — 90%-98%
-
Reduce
Failure Rate—50%-90%
-
Increase
Capacity— 10%-30%
-
Improve
Quality
-
Reduce
Frustration
|